Pat’s Petition and CarerWatch have consulted with as many campaigners as possible and reached a conclusion.

WCA should be a ‘can’t do’ test. The positive and optimistic ‘can do’ narrative has completely overwhelmed the reality of the ‘can’t do’ narrative. All sick and disabled people should own and be out and proud about both their narratives. Every one has a ‘can do’ and a ‘can’t do’ narrative. Viva Dead Parrot has had a great reception.

Read all about it here and here and here


Today John Pring followed Ekklesia and reported on the Dead Parrot campaign on the Disability News Service

Let’s bring the bar to the Support Group down to a safe level


Ekklesis support Dead Parrot Campaign – here


PP and CW launch the Dead Parrot Campaign

please come and support here


ESA is a dead parrot

ESA (Employment and Support Allowance ) has destroyed the covenant between sick and disabled people and the state. It has to go.

Pat’s Petition and CarerWatch working with other campaigners suggest the following basis for reform:

The replacement for ESA should be paid, without conditionality, to anyone who cannot find work because of reduced productivity.

The current labour market is ruthless. It will take people who can do the most work for the least money. People with reduced productivity, even after all reasonable adjustments have been made, will be rejected by this market. They need unconditional support.

The bar for entry into the Support Group is set far too high, leaving people whose productivity cannot be equalised with reasonable adjustments with no viable social security support.

The government could address this by intervening, in ESA criteria, employment & equalities law and the market, but it chooses not to.

Until this changes, people whose productivity is reduced won’t be able to gain employment and so need a safe secure income without threats and conditionality.






It is an inconvenient and dangerous truth that impairment actually impairs. In this fiercely competitive labour market impairment often makes it logically impossible for an employer to choose sick and disabled people. This is why almost no one on ESA is getting a job.

This is an inconvenient truth for the government who don’t want to pay to support sick and disabled people.  The government are denying this truth with ‘can do’ tick boxes. They are forcing sick and disabled people to do the impossible and support themselves through work that they logically cannot get.

We live in a neo liberal capitalist world where the employment market is fiercely competitive. Employers recruit the candidates who they judge will do the most work for the least money. Some sick and disabled people will have impairment that impacts on their productivity. It is logical that a competitive labour market will reject them.

The government will not accept this truth. They continue to say that sick and disabled people must work even when they can’t compete. Sick and disabled people are put in the WRAG, and are having their benefits removed, and are being sanctioned and timed out when competing for a job is something that they logically cannot do.  The government is selling a false and illogical prospectus and the results are disastrous and cruel.

Fear leads some sick and disabled people to collude with the government in this illogical situation.  They fear that admitting that impairment can impair could be dangerous.  They are frightened that this truth might lead to society marginalising them even further.

But one look at the way that the other Equalities have fought and won inclusion should demonstrate that denial of difference is never the way forward.  The other Equalities were won by minorities coming out and admitting their differences and being proud.

Admitting that impairment impairs would liberate sick and disabled people and allow them to fight the welfare reforms from a realistic and honest position. Surely we have moved past the time when minority groups hid in the shadows in denial of difference.

Sick and disabled people have to come out and be proud and admit that impairment sometimes actually impairs.

This admission should not lead to marginalisation. In fact it should lead to better ways to deal with the reality of impairment and lead to more inclusion on honest terms.

Paralympians are already there – they are out and proud – they achieve wonderful things without trying to claim that they can compete on a level playing field in mainstream sporting events.

Women showed the way.  Women identified their barriers to employment and the government intervened proactively time and again with legislation to address the problems caused by differences such as child birth and child care.

Sick and disabled people have to do the same. They have to own their differences. They have to admit that impairment sometimes impacts on productivity. Then they have to demand that the government intervene in the labour market to enable them to get jobs.

Until that happens they need the government to stop telling them to do something that they cannot do and to stop withdrawing benefits and running a regime of coercion and fear.

Currently the only strategy the government uses to intervene in the labour market on behalf of sick and disabled people is ‘reasonable adjustments.’ This is enough to secure inclusion for some people but as the catastrophic statistics from the WRAG show so starkly – it is not nearly enough for many others.

The logic of ‘reasonable adjustments’ is that the government are setting the bar very high. Only people for whom ‘reasonable adjustments’ are enough can get work. Sick and disabled people should demand a much lower bar that includes people with impairment and a far higher rate of inclusion. There is no point the government proclaiming inclusion in the workforce and then refusing to intervene in the labour market in ways that will help more than a few token people.

Sick and disabled people need to come together to find new and innovative strategies based on the reality of impairment.  It may take legislation around quotas and subsidies. It may take sheltered working spread throughout the workforce. It may take monitoring and public naming and congratulating companies that are willing to help. There will be many strategies that can be used to deliver real, honest inclusion. Sick and disabled people have to find them and demand them.

But nothing will happen until sick and disabled people come out and admit that sometimes impairment actually impairs.

Then we can open a rational discussion about the way forward and find new and positive solutions. The social model has succeeded brilliantly in extending inclusion for sick and disabled people, but it is difficult to see how it can progress further against a ruthlessly competitive labour market. Demanding that employers take on people who are not competitive is doomed to failure without providing incentives for and support for employers. IDS and the work programme have proved this.

We must now push for interventions in the labour market to extend the social model and increase inclusion.







Christina McKelvie raises the following Motion in the Scottish Parliament

That the Parliament notes with strong concern what it sees as the continuing austerity being forced on the whole of the UK by the UK Government, with the main focus on reforming welfare provision, which it considers detrimentally affects disabled, unemployed and young people; notes calls for a limitation on the use of sanctions, timing people out, the use of the “bedroom tax” for disabled people and repeated assessments of those deemed unfit for work; believes that, throughout the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse constituency and across Scotland, disabled people are being punished by welfare reform, and notes the view that, until a system is introduced that supports carers and disabled people, welfare reform should be brought to an end.

full details here

Thank you Christine



A New Shadow Front Bench Team for Labour.


Jeremy Corbyn is the new Leader of the Labour Party and he has called for a New Kinder Politics.

Pat’s Petition and CarerWatch ask Jeremy to fight for a New Kinder WRAG

Debbie Abrahams is the new Shadow Minister for disability. Debbie already has a lot of experience of the harsh regime in the WRAG from her work on the Select Committee and we hope she will continue to fight against the sanctions and time limits which make the WRAG so unkind.

Luciana Berger is the first ever Shadow Minister for Mental Health. An exciting new appointment especially as so many people with mental health issues are being subject to inappropriate pressure in the WRAG.

Kate Green is the Shadow Minister for Equalities. Kate contributed to this blog for a long time in her previous post. We think Kate has the hardest job of all – the question of inequality in the workplace for disability is so much more complicated than the other Equalities. Some sick and disabled people may be less productive at times than fit workers and this makes this Equality fight different from the others.

Eight years in to ESA and we still haven’t had the discussion – what does ‘fit for work’ mean. We test for it but we don’t discuss or define it.

This is a capitalist society with a lean, mean labour market.

To the employer ‘fit for work’ means an employee who can compete with other contenders as someone who can produce the most work, the most reliably for the least money.

A sick and/or disabled person may be able to do this with reasonable adjustments. So with support they are ‘fit for work’.

So where does that leave other sick and disabled people who have conditions which mean that they may attend less regularly than a fit worker and some days not be as productive.

They are not ‘fit for work’ in this capitalist labour market.

They are ‘fit for work’ in a more benign environment where productivity is not the only concern. But that environment does not exist in the UK in 2015.

So they are not currently ‘fit for work’. They are mainly in an impossible position in the WRAG. This is a great opportunity for the new Kinder politics.

We hope Kate will finally be the person to tackle this issue. The government produced money to tackle Women’s Equality – many things like childcare and maternity leave. We need  inspired, creative innovations for sick and disabled people to deal with any extra costs to the employer.


I want to say so much. Scream why?

At this time, while there is so much media attention on the significant number of deaths following a WCA, we at Pat’s Petition are taking a quiet moment to remember special friends and colleagues. In particular the seventh founder member of the Pat’s Petition Team. Just one among those we have lost.

We know that many of you will likewise be thinking about lost friends. The human and personal cost of each one of these 2380 deaths must not be forgotten.

Pat x


Thousands have died after being found fit for work, DWP figures show

Death has become a part of Britain’s benefits system here

Jeremy Corbyn says Iain Duncan Smith should resign over fit for work deaths here

The DWP say – “DWP does not hold information on the reason for death”

So yet again the DWP do not collect the information and have no way of knowing if their policies are safe. Just like the Cumulative Impact Assessment. They should want to know. It is their responsibility to know.


Stop the War against Sick and Disabled People

Why does Mr Duncan Smith run the DWP as if he is at war.
Mr Duncan Smith made a speech and admitted yesterday that he has struggled unsuccessfully with the
problems of getting sick and disabled people in to work for five years.
Yesterday he admitted that his binary can work/can’t work division for sick
and disabled people is simplistic and he seemed to be moving back to
something much more like the traditional ‘permitted work’ scheme.
Perhaps soon he will begin to understand that many sick and disabled people
actually can’t compete on a level playing field in a competitive labour
market and he will fix the playing field.
These are difficult problems and need a collegiate, collaborative approach.
But while Mr Duncan Smith continues to talk and act as if he is at war with
sick and disabled people – he is running a reign of terror. He creates fear
and anxiety and anxiety makes all conditions worse.
Secretary of State at DWP can be done with concern or menace. Why does he always choose menace.
Pat’s Petition and CarerWatch continue to call for a Ceasefire – let’s move
forward without this artificially induced climate of fear.
Stop the War against Sick and Disabled People
read Frances Ryan here
 read the Telegraph here



At last – some answers from the candidates. Thanks Disability Labour.

It’s great that all the leadership candidates are aware of how badly sick and disabled people seeking employment have been treated by the last government. Sadly the Labour Opposition did not speak up for them at the time.

However Jeremy Corbyn is the only candidate to talk about lifting the harsh and punitive measures designed to pressurise disabled people in to work that they aren’t able to find.

Our Ceasefire campaign calls for the sanctions and time limits to be halted while disabled people still face these difficulties in finding work. Only Jeremy Corbyn talks about this.




The WRAG finally came out in Parliament today. Stephen Timms, Kate Green, MPs from the SNP, LibDems and Labour talked about the WRAG – talked about the sick and disabled people in the WRAG who are assessed as not fit for work and don’t get jobs but are then treated as if they are imminently on their way back to work.

This was the first time that these issues with the WRAG have been given full attention in parliament. The attention was driven by the cut to ESA WRAG payments in the Welfare Bill.

Unfortunately the discussion didn’t go further and explore the grossly unfair sanctions and the time limits in the WRAG. But now that MPs have finally discovered that the WRAG is not full of recovering people on their way quickly and easily back to work – perhaps the discussion can move on to tackling the current cruel regime in the WRAG.



At last – some information on where the Labour Leadership Contenders stand on ESA.

John Pring at the Disability News Service has interviewed them all – see interviews here

Having looked carefully at the interviews our conclusion is that only Jeremy Corbyn understands and addresses the disastrous design flaws in the WRAG.

Ironically – cutting the level of payment in the WRAG to JSA levels has finally drawn public attention to this unhappy group. Great description of the problems in Ekklesia here. Read the Spartacus response here and here.

There seems to be an assumption that people in the WRAG will become fit for work with time.  But nothing in the WCA test is about the expected course of any condition in the future. WCA merely says that you are not fit for work today. You may have a permanent or deteriorating condition. Why are they treating you as if you are getting better. Harriet Harman actually raised the point in PMQs that people with progressive conditions are in the WRAG.

David Cameron’s illogical response to Harriet Harman was to say that more people on JSA get work and so cutting to JSA levels was an incentive. This reinforced the idea that people in the WRAG are becoming fit for work and just need to be incentivised. But many are probably moving further from work if their condition is deteriorating.

Time limits of one year also reinforce the idea that their problems are temporary.
Jeremy Corbyn seems to be the only candidate who understands that treating people with permanent and deteriorating conditions as if they are getting better is frightening and cruel.
The others candidates are aware that sanctions are harsh in these circumstances but none of them seem ready to challenge the false assumption that people in the WRAG are getting better. If the WRAG is a rehabilitation group for people who are getting better then make the WCA a test for that and don’t put people with long term and deteriorating conditions in the WRAG.


Congratulations to Andy Burnham for challenging the cut in ESA in the Budget. Please can the Labour Party also challenge the existing punitive regime in the ESA/WRAG with sanctions and time limits.


Congratulation to Harriet Harman for challenging David Cameron at PMQs today about the cuts to ESA/WRAG payments in the Budget. David Cameron’s reply that ESA/WRAG was cut as an incentive to go to work because JSA claimants are more successful at finding work than ESA claimants is absurd. The evidence does show that JSA claimants are more successful which is why ESA claimants need more not less protection.

Given the cumulative impact on people in the WRAG of sanctions, time limits, means tests and now cuts in income we hope that the leadership contenders will now clarify their positions and tell us how they hope to protect people in the WRAG.



Three leadership contenders have challenged Harriet Harman about her suggestion that Labour will support the latest welfare reforms. Pat’s Petition and CarerWatch are disappointed that the focus has been so resolutely on tax credits for families. Not a mention of the reduction to JSA levels of ESA/WRAG in the Budget.

This is a repeat of the public outcry about means testing family benefits at £45,000. Massive media coverage. No mention that ESA/WRAG after a year is means tested at £7500. This replaced an unconditional income benefit. But no media coverage at all for cuts in disability benefits.


We have received a helpful reply from Yvette Cooper.

Thank you for contacting the Yvette for Labour campaign.

Labour introduced the ESA to offer more support to those who couldn’t work while  recognising that, while some people might not be able to work immediately, they  could be able to do so at some point in the future. That is why we created the work related activity group (WRAG) within ESA, and introduced work focussed health related assessments, scrapped by the last Tory led government. It is right to offer those who could work at some point the appropriate support to enable them to maintain skills and confidence, and contact with the labour market, in order to ease a future return to work.

But we also recognised people who could not work immediately would suffer additional financial hardship. Proposals to remove the work related activity element from ESA and cut the financial support to those individuals fly in the face of a benefit that was designed to enable and support a return to work for people when they were ready to do so, and properly protect them while they were unable to work.

Best wishes,

The Yvette for Labour Team



At last we have a reply from one of the contenders.

Jeremy Corbyn’s campaign have told us – Yes, Jeremy is in favour of scrapping both sanctions and the WCA. Sorry for delay in reply.

So thank you Jeremy for the support.


Again we have written to all the Labour Leadership contenders and asked if they would support Ceasefire. And again – absolutely no reply.

This is very strange. In most elections – candidates are quick to engage with people – candidates are looking to explain their position and win support. What is different about this election – that candidates imagine they will win more support by saying nothing?

Many sick and disabled people and carers and their friends and families have looked to the Labour Party to support them. Many will be voting in this election as members or supporters. Surely they are entitled to know the policies that the potential new leader intends to implement and support.

CEASEFIRE is a very simple measure designed to protect sick and disabled people in the WRAG until the disastrous problems with ESA are sorted out. Sick and disabled people need this now.



We have repeatedly written the Labour Leadership contenders asking them if they will support Ceasefire.

Absolutely no reply from any of them.

It seems DNS is having the same problem.



So a new day – a new beginning – a new Conservative government and a new Labour opposition.

Pat’s Petition and CarerWatch will continue to campaign to persuade the new Labour and LibDem opposition to support CEASEFIRE.

We know that we have strong support in the new Parliament from the SNP, the Greens and Plaid Cymru. Over the next few months we will be trying very hard persuade the leadership contenders in the Labour and LibDem parties to commit to supporting Ceasefire.

Watch this space.


Statement from Pat’s Petition and CarerWatch

Pat’s Petition and CarerWatch have tried to find out from all parties whether, if elected, they would call a halt and make time to put right the mistakes that have been made in welfare reform for disabled people and carers. Thousands of people have signed petitions asking for the government to assess the impact of all the changes before continuing with the experiment. We have asked for a ceasefire on ESA until they can prove that work programmes are successful.

Our findings are that the SNP, the Green Party and Plaid Cymru are supportive of these views.

The Conservative and Labour Parties are not.

Many thanks to all of you who have supported the Emergency Ceasefire campaign.

Please pass this statement on to everyone who may find the information helpful in deciding how to cast their vote.




The Contradiction that makes the WRAG Inhumane

The primary legislation for ESA defines sick and disabled people awarded ESA as having a condition that means that they are not required to work.

However the conditions in the WRAG for the last five years – mandatory work activity enforced by sanctions and a time limit of one year – is a regime that appears to require people in the WRAG to find work within a specific timescale. This is in contradiction to the legislation.

This is despite the evidence that continues to show that people in the WRAG don’t and can’t find work: the work programme isn’t working.

There is now also a terrible legacy of the many sick and disabled people who have been through the WRAG but have not found work within a year, and then been unjustly timed out from ESA. The Disappeared.


*  Leaders Debate on 16th April

Many, many thanks to Natalie Bennett of the Green Party for so forcefully raising the issues of welfare in the Leaders Debate. We have to break the silence on welfare in these debates. Thank you.


Jonathan Bartley – Green Party Spokesperson for DWP – supported Ceasefire in this debate on 5th May

see the challenge Jonathan made to Iain Duncan Smith herehere – and here


*election debate



Leanne Wood – Leader – Plaid Cymru supports Ceasefire

We look forward to support for Ceasefire from Plaid Cymru in the new Parliament

Read the Plaid Cymru Disability commitments here


Christina McKelvie – SNP  Member Scottish Parliament – Deputy Convenor of the Welfare Reform Committee

We look forward to support for Ceasefire in the new Parliament from the SNP


Christina McKelvie has submitted the following motion to the Scottish Parliament Motion Text:

That the Parliament welcomes the campaign by Pat’s Petition and CarerWatch for an immediate “ceasefire” on welfare reform; notes their call for an immediate truce on the use of sanctions, timing people out, the use of the bedroom tax for disabled people and repeated assessments for those deemed unfit for work; believes that, throughout the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse parliamentary constituency and across Scotland, disabled people are being punished by welfare reform, and notes the view that, until a system is introduced that supports carers and disabled people, welfare reform should brought to an end.
Unfortunately Labour are not going to support Ceasefire. Below is a  lengthy correspondence with Kate Green of the Labour Party which makes this clear – in reverse time order – latest at top. Many thanks to Kate for explaining the Labour position so fully to us.
*22.04.2015 Kate Green Labour to PP and CW
The Work Support programme will replace the Work Programme and Work
Choice for those on ESA (other than those with a very short prognosis
of a return to work) , and will be contracted at local level so that
we are able to draw upon the expertise of specialist and local
disability organisations. I welcome your suggestion that innovative
projects could be co-produced with disabled people and carers, and we
will certainly want to encourage local authorities and others to
foster such approaches.For those in the WRAG, participation in the programme will be
mandatory, although Jobcentre Plus staff will work with claimants via
the claimant commitment to ensure the support they receive and the
programme they participate in is appropriate to their needs and
circumstances.We do think it’s reasonable that there should be conditions for
benefits for those able to work or prepare for work, but the system
must be proportionate, supportive and fair. Our reforms to the WCA,
our offer of specialist employment support, and our commitment to
abolish targets for sanctions will all help to ensure wishes

19.04.2015 – PP and CW to Kate Green
Dear Kate
We understand that Stephen Timms meant that Labour intend to replace the Work Programme with the Work Support Programme.
Please could you now give us more clarity and a statement on how you see the new Work Support Programme? In particular whether participation will be voluntary.
A new Programme could provide some innovative projects based on local need and co-produced with disabled people and carers. But collating evidence from disparate projects will be even more difficult.
As we said in an earlier e-mail – every key benefit change means some degree of experimentation, but experimenting on real people in real time has a real consequence for those it fails. The past five years have been excessively and unnecessarily traumatic.  This new Programme is yet another experiment and as such we believe it should be treated as a pilot. We therefore think that, until the evidence comes in that it works, participation must be by choice rather than by sanction.
We believe that removing sanctions will enable any new programme to work with people who want to return to work. This gives an opportunity to build up some positive evidence on financial savings as well as success rates. Once it has been proved to work, then perhaps consider sanctions. But until any programme can be shown to be successful, it is unfair to sanction people who do not want to take part.
Enough is enough. We need a ceasefire for disabled people and carers.
Pat x
Pat’s Petition and CarerWatch
Last night at a hustings held by the Disability Benefits Consortium the Labour Minister Stephen Timms said –* Labour will take ESA off Work Programme apart from those with short awards (3 or possibly 6 months)

* He also said that if Labour had resources to commit to welfare reform one of the first things he would like to do is extend time limiting for ESA beyond 12 months because it wasn’t long enough for people to recover.

12.04.2015 from PP and CW to Kate Green
Dear Kate
Thank you for taking part in this discussion. It has been very useful. 

We agree that ESA is still not fit for purpose.

We are pleased that you are suggesting yet further proposals to try and make ESA work, but trust you will understand when we say that we don’t think this is the complete answer.
After the weary history of past failed attempts, we remain sceptical that any further experimentation will provide the illusive solution. The five annual reviews of WCA have not made any significant impact, nor the many changes to the Work Programme over the last five years. As a result the WCA has resulted in damage to the health and wellbeing of hundreds of thousands of people.  Most people recognise now that there is no quick fix. We have to be realistic and face up to the reality that for the next few years ESA will still not be fit for purpose.
The test that reform has worked will be real evidence about people moving in to work and that will take time. 
Moving to self-referral to the Work Programme for a fixed period of time would provide an opportunity to develop the evidence for people who want to return to work. The benefits are likely to include a significant financial saving and increased wellbeing (less stress) for sick and disabled people. Only once the Work Programme has been proved to be helpful and successful, should we start looking again at sanctions and compulsory programmes.
Every key benefit change means some degree of experimentation, but experimenting on real people in real time has a real consequence for those it fails. The past five years have been excessively and unnecessarily traumatic. Enough is enough.
So what we are asking in Ceasefire is for protection in the meantime until ESA is made safe. Please will you support Ceasefire and make the work programme voluntary and stop the time limits – until you have evidence that sick and disabled people are moving in to work.
It would be great to announce that Labour is supporting Ceasefire before the Thunderclap on Thursday and the next Leaders Debate.
Pat, Rosemary, Frances
 Pat’s Petition and CarerWatch
*09.14.2015 from Kate Green to PP and CW

Dear Pat, Frances and Rosemary

In response to your further points about the WRAG, there are twoissues to address: ensuring that the WCA process allocates people to that group only if it is appropriate to do so; and ensuring that those who are properly placed in the WRAG are able to access good quality employment-related support.

On the former, we have set out how we will improve the quality of the WCA, including introducing penalties on assessors for poor or wrong assessments. On the latter, we will replace the generic and failing Work Programme with a specialist programme of Work Support for disabled people on ESA, contracted locally, with the opportunity for smaller and specialist organisations to participate.

I believe these two strategies can address the concerns that have been raised about the experiences of those in the WRAG, including by the select committee. We will of course keep this under very close review in government.

Of course you may share this response (and my previous response) with your supporters via your website.

best wishes


PP and CW welcomed these assurances. However we were still concerned that the WRAG is not fit for purpose and sent the following reply to Kate.
*09.04.2015 from PP and CW to Kate Green
 Thank you for this. We welcome your assurances on the bedroom tax and the unnecessary repeated assessments.
That leaves us with the problem of the WRAG. When Labour introduced ESA Lord Oakeshott said that it was an enormous social experiment and there was no evidence to base it on. Lord Mackenzie for Labour agreed. Lord Oakeshott said that the Lords were effectively being asked to sign a blank cheque. Lord Mackenzie agreed. The check and balance they agreed on was that ESA would be closely monitored and adjusted in the light of emerging evidence. We think the time has come to deliver on that promise.
The evidence is now available. Most sick and disabled people in the WRAG are not getting jobs. This may be due to the nature of the competitive labour market that they have to compete in or the nature of the work programme. It is not the fault of sick and disabled people.
We think it is now time to deliver on that promise and stop penalising sick and disabled people in the WRAG in an attempt to force them to do something that they cannot do. Until such time as the evidence shows that sick and disabled people can move in to employment we think the work programme should become voluntary and the meaningless time limit should be lifted.
We really hope that you can agree to these promised checks and balances until the evidence shows that this model for ESA is delivering jobs.
Pats Petition and CarerWatch
*March 2015
Kate Green – Disability Spokesperson for Labour tells us – We have been clear that sanctions must be used sparingly and appropriately, and that there must be no “targets” for the number of cases sanctioned by Jobcentre Plus.
Kate Green has written to us and said –
You will also be aware that Labour has committed to scrap the bedroom tax as soon as we come into government, and this will of course particularly benefit the two thirds of households affected who have a disabled family member and the 60,000+ carers affected.   We are anxious to reduce the number of unnecessary face to face assessments, which can cause stress to individuals and pile up cost to the public purse, by better sharing of information across different assessment processes, and by imposing penalties on providers for poor or wrong assessments. And we also agree that those not required to look for work should be able to access support via the Work Programme (or the new localised programme of specialist support that we intend to put in place to replace it for disabled people) on a voluntary basis
 Read about the campaign here

phone-31172_640Sick and disabled people, and their carers, are suffering every day – caught up in the disaster that is the failed Employment and Support Allowance (ESA).

Groups from across the whole spectrum of disability campaigning have come together to call for a CEASEFIRE – until this is sorted out.

We call for an immediate truce during which the following practices are ended, while a new programme is co-produced with disabled people and carersSTOP * the use of sanctions * timing people out * means testing * bedroom tax for disabled people * repeated assessments We also suggest that – * anyone can use the current Work Programme – but only on an opt-in basis and without sanctions

This does not prejudice any long term changes, and we recognise that different groups have different aims.

These measures are not a long term solution, but together they would offer a period of safety in which to consider a better way forward.


The following people have signed in support of this Emergency Call for a Ceasefire

Jonathan Bartley  Green Party Spokesperson for DWPLeanne Wood  Leader Plaid CymruChristina McKelvie  SNP  Member Scottish Parliament – Deputy Convenor of the Welfare Reform Committee -Pat Onions  Pat’s Petition – Rosemary O’Neill  CarerWatch – Gail Ward – Mo Stewart – Pam Pinder  CarersforumUK – John McArdle  Black Triangle – Carole Rutherford  Act Now for Autism – Phil Connolly  DRUK – Caroline Richardson  Spartacus – Catherine Hale – Simon Duffy- Centre for Welfare Reform – Paul Swann  Disability Wales – Ian Hodson BFAWU – Rosemary Trustam  Community Living  Initiatives Ltd CFAFS England – Sue Livett  The Aldingbourne Trust – Bernadette Meaden – WOWcampaign -New Approach – Simon Barrow Director of Ekklesia – Prof Peter Beresford – Prof Alan Roulsden – Steve Griffiths – Chris Johnstone  GP – Samuel Miller

If you, as an individual or group/organisation, support this action, please add your name in the comments below. You can also send any supporting statements to or