Dear Carer Watch,

In what may represent a dramatic victory for campaigners, Care Services Minister
Phil Hope yesterday told a reporter at the Labour Party conference that DLA is not
under threat by the care green paper.

According to the Disability Now website, Phil Hope, when asked if he would abolish
DLA after the election, replied:

“No. All the models that we have done have not included DLA. But if people were to
make a case to integrate DLA into a comprehensive system, then I’m very happy to
hear that case and have those arguments.

“DLA is not under threat and people can be very happy”.

For more details and our reaction, visit:
Benefits and work

We know that some people will claim that the minister’s comments are evidence that
campaigning to save DLA was unnecessary. It’s a claim, however, that can only be be
made by ignoring such as the following.

1 Earlier this month the DWP press office said in relation to whether DLA would be
scrapped: “It depends on what people say in the consultation. We need to see what
people say when they respond.”

2 The same minister who is now saying DLA is not under threat wrote to MEP Liz Lynne
just a fortnight ago stating that: “. . . this is a consultation exercise and no
final decisions have been made about which disability benefits might be involved, or
how they would be affected.”

3 The same minister also refused to rule out the possibility of DLA being axed in an
interview earlier this month with Disability Now.

4 Last month CPAG claimed that it had received assurances from ‘senior sources’ at
the DWP that DLA was not under threat. Just four days later CPAG revealed that it
had “subsequently been contacted by the DWP who have said that no decisions have
been taken as to the future of DLA whilst the consultation is ongoing.” CPAG then
went off to lobby the Department of Health on the issue.

5 For almost two months national charities such as the MS Society have tried, but
failed, to get clarification from the government as to whether DLA would be affected
by the care green paper.

6 Just last week, David Behan, the Director General of Social Care at the Department
of Health, published a blog post on the Big Care Debate website clearly trying to
reduce the flood of hostile responses. He could have easily done so by saying
outright that DLA would not be affected by the green paper – he didn’t.

The reality is that, if the government have now stepped back from an attack on DLA
before the care consultation has even ended, it is because of the literally
thousands of angry responses on the Big Care Debate website, the thousands of
signatures on petitions, the torrent of angry letters to MPs, the motions before the
Scottish and Welsh assemblies and the growing pressure from disability charities who
were themselves under enormous pressure from outraged claimants.

It’s because the focus on the single issue of benefits is fast becoming a public
relations disaster for a green paper signed by no fewer than six secretaries of

Above all, if there’s been a change of heart, it’s because you have fought so
effectively to protect the benefits of disabled people.

Here at Benefits and Work we don’t know if the fight is yet over for DLA, but we do
know for certain it’s only just begun for AA.

Good luck,

Steve Donnison


CPAG admits DLA is not safe

DLA threat website tries to stem hostile responses

Scrapping DLA is an option confirms DWP

Is the Big Care Debate being nobbled?

Scottish and Welsh assemblies campaign for DLA and AA

No 10 DLA and AA petition needs you

“DLA is not under threat . . . be very happy” says government minister—-be-very-happy-says-government-minister

Please feel free to forward or publish this email.